Electric Toothbrush

Electric Toothbrush

An electric toothbrush is a brush that delivers fast, automated bristle movements, either back-and-forth oscillation or rotation-oscillation (where the brush head reciprocates clockwise and counterclockwise turns), to brush your dentition.

An engine makes the movements at sonic speeds or below. In the case of ultrasonic brushes, the generation of ultrasonic movements is by a piezoelectric crystal. Contemporary electronic toothbrushes energy source is usually by a rechargeable battery replenished through “inductive charging” as the brush resides in the charging base between uses. The classification of electric toothbrushes is often according to their movements frequency (sonic or ultrasonic), depending on whether they make movements below, in, or above the hearing range (20–20,000 Hz) or 2400–2,400,000 oscillations per minute), respectively.

Oral_B
https://images.app.goo.gl/fiRVhDCZGAxMmMtw7

History

Tomlinson Moseley first produced the earliest example of an electric toothbrush. Marketed as the “Motodent”, a patent was filed by his company, Motodent Inc, on 13 December 1937. In Switzerland in 1954, Dr. P.G Woog developed the Broxodent. The initial manufacturing of Woog’s motorized brushes was in Switzerland (later in France) for Broxo S.A. The brush was plugged into a regular wall outlet and ran on “line” voltage. The initial creation of electric toothbrushes was for patients with limited motor skills and or for patients in orthodontic brackets.

https://images.app.goo.gl/ZX7Kf8vvkWkYcLy29

The Broxo Electric Toothbrush was launched in the U.S. by E. R. Squibb and Sons Pharmaceuticals in 1960. After its debut, it was advertised in the U.S. by Squibb under the names Broxo-Dent or Broxodent. In the 1980s, Squibb transferred the administration of the Broxodent line to the Somerset Labs division of Bristol-Myers Squibb.

https://images.app.goo.gl/CEKnrnXfd3j3xJxq7

General Electric launched the “automatic toothbrush” in the early 1960s; it was cordless with rechargeable NiCad batteries. Although movable, it was rather cumbersome, about the size of a two-D-cell flashlight handle. In addition, NiCad batteries of suffered from the “Memory effect”. The G.E. Automatic Toothbrush came with a charging stand that held the handpiece upward; the user kept the unit in the charger (when not in use), which is not the best way to get ideal service life from a NiCad battery. Also, the first NiCad batteries had a brief lifespan. The G.E device had the batteries sealed inside it, and you had to discard the whole unit when the batteries failed.

https://images.app.goo.gl/vxPyvm7F8iq9bq8ZA

The use of an A.C. line voltage appliance in a bathroom environment was problematic. By the early 1990s, Underwriter Laboratories (U.L.) and Canadian Standards Association (CSA) no longer certified line-voltage appliances for bathroom use. Instead, newer appliances used a step-down transformer to operate the toothbrush at low voltage (typically 12, 16, or 24 volts). In addition, wiring standards in many countries mandated the protection of outlets in bath areas by an RCD/GFCI device (e.g., required in the USA since the 1970s on bathroom outlets in new construction).

By the 1990s, there were safety concerns with Broxo’s original design. Further, updated battery-operated brushes were providing better alternatives in the marketplace.

1tooth broxodent
https://images.app.goo.gl/BqK8Np15PkdZfLmK9

The original ultrasonic toothbrush, first named the Ultima and later the Ultrasonex, was registered in the U.S. in 1992. Initially, the Ultima operated only on ultrasound, but later, they added an engine to give the Ultrasonex brush extra sonic vibration. Today, several ultrasonic toothbrushes concurrently provide both ultrasound and sonic vibration.

Types of Electric toothbrushes

The classification of electric brushes is according to their action type.

  • “Side to side quivering”, which has a brush head action that moves laterally from side to side.
  • “Counter oscillation”, in which brush heads move clockwise and others move counterclockwise.
  • “Rotation oscillation” designates brushes in which the bristle head revolves in one direction and then the other.
  • A “Circular” indicates a brush effect in which the brush head wheels move in one direction only.
  • Ultrasonic means a brush action where the bristles flutter at ultrasonic frequencies (greater than 20 kilohertz)
  • Ionic refers to a brush that gives an electric charge to the tooth surface to disrupt the attachment of dental plaque.

Some vibrating toothbrush designs call for a brushing technique similar to that used with a manual toothbrush. In contrast, the recommended cleaning technique with brushes with a “spinning head” is to move the brush slowly from tooth to tooth.

electrictoothbrush-2048px-8632
https://images.app.goo.gl/wWzHZ45o7N1f1Vte9

The classification of electric toothbrushes is also according to the speed of their movements as standard power toothbrushes, sonic toothbrushes, or ultrasonic toothbrushes. It’s called a sonic brush; if the motion is sufficiently rapid to produce a hum in the audible frequency of the human range (20 Hz to 20,000 Hz)—any electronic brush with movement quicker than this threshold is called an ultrasonic toothbrush. Specific ultrasonic brushes, such as the “Megasonex” and the “Ultra”, have sonic and ultrasonic actions.

electric-toothbrush-benefits-commerce-michigan-dental-office-1
https://images.app.goo.gl/1SYCcJX7Ny9bbMK1A

Oscillating Rotating toothbrush

Oral B iO toothbrush

Oral B introduced the oscillating rotating toothbrush in the 1990s. It is known to be effective for plaque removal and the reduction and management of gingivitis. Their newest flagship version is the Oral B iO, a smaller circular brush head that vacillates and dislodges plaque. The brush head design is very similar to the prophylaxis handpiece used by Dr. Hawryluk to remove plaque at his Mississauga dental office. The configuration enables the bristles to reach further into the ‘hard-to-reach spaces separating the teeth to eliminate plaque. Some variants of the oscillating rotating toothbrush also include a pulsating action which facilitates a more “3D-clean”.

io-image-6-1596659564
https://images.app.goo.gl/UFk5e7vkTtfLizMC8

The Oral B iO brush features a linear magnetic drive system. This arrangement provides the convergence of power at the tip of the brush bristles while using the oscillating rotating movement for efficient plaque elimination. The brush also provides for 3D monitoring utilizing artificial intelligence that unites the toothbrush with an app. This technology allows you to have an instant evaluation of your brushing performance. If the user wants to bring the report to Dr. Hawryluk for a more personalized oral health review, it can track the data you can discuss with him.

Furthermore, there is an automated calibration of the Oral B iO toothbrush via a pressure sensor. It informs you if your putting too much force or not enough and adjusts the oscillation speed to shield the teeth and gums from excess pressure. Oscillating rotating toothbrushes are demonstrated to be trustworthy compared to manual toothbrushes and are safe for the oral cavity’s hard and soft tissues.

https://images.app.goo.gl/rUSbHUBu6Z7EmjBHA

Sonic toothbrush

Sonic brushes are a subset of electric toothbrushes with fast enough movement to produce vibration in the audible range. Most modern rechargeable electric toothbrushes, i.e., Sonicare, FOREO, and Oral-B, fall into this category. They typically have frequencies ranging from 200 to 400 Hz, 12,000–24,000 oscillations, or 24,000–48,000 movements per 60 seconds. Because sonic toothbrushes use a sweeping motion to clean the teeth, their action is often high in amplitude, indicating that the extent of the sweeping movements is large. In addition, one study found that using a sonic toothbrush causes minor abrasion to the gum compared to the manual toothbrush.

Ultrasonic toothbrush

The latest developments in this field are ultrasonic toothbrushes, which use ultrasonic waves to clean the teeth. To deem a toothbrush “ultrasonic,” it has to emanate a wave at a minimum frequency of 20 thousand Hertz or 2,400,000 movements per minute. Typically, ultrasonic operates at a frequency of 1.6 megahertz, which equates to 192,000,000 movements per 60 seconds.

Ultrasonic toothbrushes emanate vibrations that are very sky-high in frequency but lower in amplitude. These vibrations break down bacterial chains that make up dental plaque and remove their attachment methods to the tooth up to 5 mm underneath the gingival margin.

https://images.app.goo.gl/ajUfDQQLmw7KCgqs7

Some ultrasonic brushes, such as the Emmi-Dent, allow solely ultrasonic motion. Other ultrasonic toothbrushes, such as the “Ultra” and the “Megasonex”, allow additional sonic vibration fluctuating from 9,000 to 40,000 oscillations per 60 seconds, mimicking a sonic toothbrush, to provide further sweeping motion that facilitates extra removal of food particles and bacterial chain remnants. However, the sonic vibration in these ultrasonic toothbrushes may be lower in amplitude than that found in sonic toothbrushes since bacterial chains do not need to be removed through sonic vibration, as the ultrasound has already broken them up.

Emmi-Dent-brush-for-braces
https://images.app.goo.gl/DDuzMuD1GxG1gUPn7

Because of the comparability of the terms “ultrasonic” and “sonic” there is some ambiguity in the marketplace. For example, a toothbrush operating at a frequency or vibration of fewer than 2,400,000 movements per 60 seconds (20,000 Hertz) is a “sonic” toothbrush. “Sonic” means its functioning frequency, for example, 31,000 movements per 60 seconds, is in a human hearing span of between roughly 20 Hertz to about 20,000 Hertz. Contrastingly, a toothbrush that transmits ultrasound or vibration at a frequency greater than the upper limit of human hearing is an “ultrasonic” toothbrush.

https://images.app.goo.gl/rtHpT9o1KfDJdH6Y7

Effectiveness

In 2014, a Cochrane investigation showed that electric toothbrushes eliminate more plaque and decrease gum inflammation (compared to manual toothbrushes). This study revealed electric toothbrushes had higher effectiveness than manual ones. For instance, brushers reduced plaque build-up and gingival inflammation by 11% and 6%, respectively. After a quarter of a year, the decrease observed was even more significant – a 21% reduction in plaque and an 11% reduction in gingival inflammation. Although the scale of these variations in a clinical setting remains uncertain, other reviews have reached similar conclusions. Another extensive review of studies also concluded that power toothbrushes were more effective in removing plaque than manual brushes for children. Thus, electric toothbrushes may be especially beneficial for patients with limited manual dexterity or difficulty reaching rear teeth.

RO https://images.app.goo.gl/LEWMdgc43ZndWHtj9[/caption]

Power source and charging

Contemporary electric brushes operate on low voltage, 12 V or less. A few brushes use a “step-down” transformer for power. Still, most use a sealed battery inside the handle, customarily but not always rechargeable and non-replaceable. While early NiCd battery toothbrushes utilized metal tabs to attach with the charging base, some toothbrushes used inductive charging.

https://images.app.goo.gl/Z75xzeMeCAPA7VVe9

Environmental concerns

The environmental group “Friends of the Earth” feels disposable electronic dental brushes are detrimental to the earth’s ecosystem. It is because it’s complicated to remove the tech from the batteries and plastic casing, which means precious and often toxic substances are deposited in a landfill or incinerated. In addition, an investigation printed in British Dental Journal observed the climate transformation potential of an electric toothbrush was 11 times higher than the bamboo toothbrush.

We hope you have enjoyed our article. Thank you for reading!

Reference:
Adam, Ralf (April 2020). “Introducing the Oral-B iO electric toothbrush: next-generation oscillating-rotating technology.” International Dental Journal. 70 Suppl 1: S1–S6.

Pitchika, V; Pink, C; Völzke, Henry; Welk, A; Kocher, Thomas; Holtfreter, Birte (2019-05-22). “Long‐term impact a powered toothbrush on oral health: an 11‐year cohort study”. Journal of Clinical Periodontology.

Davidovich, Esti; Shafir, Salome; Shay, Boaz; Zini, A (2020-07-15). “Plaque Removal by Powered Toothbrush Versus a Manual Toothbrush in Children: A Systematic Review and Analysis.” Pediatric Dentistry. 42 (4): 280–287.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_toothbrush